Change Management communication phases

Vision to Work Change Management communication phase chart

Change Management communication has four phases.

Idea communication

Awareness

Project Communications

Gauging success

idea communication-

This is the time that the original idea goes through the process of matching to corporate strategy and connecting to the experience, perspective and knowledge of stakeholders. Obviously not everything can be communicated. A sensible level of transparency during this stage will be rewarded in later phases with increased participation and productivity.

awareness-

The second phase of communicating for change management is the process of illustrating and delivering the end state description. It is the foundation for the project and task orientation. It is a translation of the idea into action and an illustration of what that looks like on the broadest scale. If done well the next phase begins, as it should, with participation, understanding and anticipation (and not the dreaded kind).

project communications-

I make it a point to educate both my high level clients and change participants that the project work is a piece separate but distinctly connected to the change piece. Change approached at the high level with a project focus has inevitable failures. Project work burdened with the lack of the first two phases also produces a level of failure. The instant a timeline becomes visible that has actual dates a different kind of process has begun than existed in the first two phases. The train has left the station and that has profound effects on people and work.

success gauge-

To have a repeatable change process, especially for transformation, a communication loop must be created to tie into the first stage of the next initiative. Also the effort, sweat (and maybe tears) of the current change deserves to be acknowledged. If Human capital development was included this is a phase for rewards. It is always a phase for rewards in general. Added celebration gives time for contemplation, confirmed acceptance of the change and a foundation for the next strategic venture.

These are not the typical phases. What usually happens is that the idea is thrown into our purple Project track with the expectation it will be converted to success and profit through the smiling faces and busy hands of the employees. Our purple phase then extends off the page with no resolution and the absence of the original change. There is however lots of change in general… just Not the kind you want as a leader.

Where are we and how do I fit in? Change Management Communication for the Stakeholder

Successful change management communication informs stakeholders of the time and place for their work.

Time-

is the relationship of stakeholder work and participation to the total amount of time for the initiative, the time frame of the phase(s) they are included in and the period they will need to accomplish their tasks.

Place-

is the relationship of that work to participation and tasks that occur before and after their own (and possibly a connection of importance to the bigger picture).

Well of course this is simple time and project management right? If we communicate what is happening then we are doing a good job.

Sorry, but no.

This is one of those subtle areas of change management that no one seems to notice. Most communication for project management and change management is a snapshot of the responsibilities of the guiding team. Add to that the delivery of “how things are going” and you have communication that simply satisfies the need of the team to check off tasks and verify “forward” movement. It does not address the stakeholders needs (and those fulfilled needs are the seeds for motivation).

What you want is the core end state description, clear phases and tasks that fall within those areas. With that you can create a rough timeline (with the pieces and relationships, but not necessarily exact timeframes) to use as the initial communication. That delivers a big picture. The phases themselves can have their own timelines and the tasks can be linked to each of the frozen “places” on the path. With that core visual built on solid up front planning you have an anchor to address changes within the process.

As you move through the timeframe of the initiative you can change the visual relationships on the timeline to re-jigger the frozen places for stakeholders.

Below is a simple timeline for the contents of a white paper I am writing. The paper moves through a knowledge buildup for the reader to get to a new understanding. With an initiative there is a layering of the right skills at the right time to get to the end state. Both can have those frozen places that rely on something previous and prepare for something to come.

As a stakeholder/reader I can see I am at the 5 W’s which I have arrived at after  a summary, background and languaging. As I move forward I will begin to understand High Level Change and make the connection to action. The dark grey signifies completion, the green the frozen place, the numbers phases or parts and the titles description tags. The bright green dot, pick your favorite color, is the end state.

image

So often practitioners blame the lack of awareness on the deletion of messages.

Shouldn’t that be a signal that something might be wrong?